Joining
IntroductionDesign for a particular component is primarily based on requirements such as:
Designing for glasses and ceramicsThe design and testing of ceramics are more critical than for any other class of materials. The reasons are that ceramics are inherently brittle and ultimately contain flaws (although production methods control their size and frequency). The following principles should be kept in mind when designing with glasses and ceramics:
It is clear from the above that design with brittle materials needs a different approach to that with conventional engineering materials such as structural steels or plastics. Joint design for ceramic-to-metal jointsGeneric rules which should be followed when producing ceramic to metal bonds include:
Some of the preferred joint designs are shown in Fig.2.
Where joint dimensions are large, or there is a large CTE mismatch between the materials, joint design and joining process are critical. Use of interlayersInterlayers can be soft, ductile metals which flex during heating and cooling to absorb stress between the two materials. Their CTE value can lie between those of the two materials being joined, or they can be functionally graded materials which have a continuously graded composition and hence a continuously graded CTE, to reduce the inherent mismatch.
Some generic interlayer designs are given in Fig.3. For some joint configurations, the use of stress-relieving interlayers is not possible and specialised joint design is the only option for relieving stress at the interface. Typically, the use of a compressive stress on the ceramic is desired, since this increases the potential joint strength. Such a bond takes advantage of the mechanical properties, in particular ductility, of the metal, such that the metal will yield in preference to the ceramic, thus stopping the ceramic from exceeding its fracture stress. Therefore, stress at the ceramic-metal interface should not exceed the bond strength, provided that the metal is in tension whilst the ceramic is in compression. A final consideration is that where service performance dictates the need for inspection, parts should be capable of being inspected by simple techniques. There are limitations to non-destructive testing of ceramics (discussed in Section 6 of this Best Practice Guide) and even a component passing inspection may not necessarily be free of flaws, although the flaws may not be significant in terms of engineering performance. One of the most important practical features of joining ceramics is joint design. This is particularly so when joining ceramics to materials having a different coefficient of thermal expansion. In this case joint design is critical, otherwise the joint may fail either during production, or in service. There are several ways to produce successful mixed CTE joints) including:
These techniques have all been applied at TWI to produce a range of CTE mismatched joints.
See below for more information about joint design for ceramics:
Copyright ©2005 TWI Ltd | ||||||||
|
Information and advice from TWI and its partners are provided in good faith and based, where appropriate, on the best engineering knowledge available at the time and incorporated into TWI's website in accordance with TWI's ISO 9001:2000 accredited status. No warranty expressed or implied is given regarding the results or effects of applying information or advice obtained from the website, nor is any responsibility accepted for any consequential loss or damage.
| ||||||||
|
|