Adhesives and sealants in medicine, dentistry and pharmacy - a review of materials and applications- Part I
TWI Bulletin, January/February 2002
Mehdi Tavakoli received a BSc in Chemistry and an MSc and PhD on Polymer Science and Technology at Aston University in Birmingham. He joined TWI in 1989 and has been working on new joining and associated technologies with particular interest in joining and coating of medical and implantable devices. He has over 20 years research, industrial problem solving and product development experience on polymeric materials and has published more than 40 papers and patents and is currently working as Technology Manager on polymers/adhesives at TWI.
The use of natural and synthetic polymers in a variety of medical applications has increased in recent years. As Mehdi Tavakoli reports, medical polymers with their diverse and unique specific properties offer many new applications as adhesives, sealants and coatings in medicine, dentistry and pharmacy.
The use of adhesives for joining medical and implantable devices was recently reviewed. [1-3] The purpose of this article is to provide a review of polymers, particularly adhesives and sealants that are suitable for tissue bonding, bone repair and those used in dentistry and pharmacy.
Tissue adhesives
Cyanoacrylates are one of the most commonly used adhesives for tissue bonding. The main reason for use in surgery is to join tissues, particularly skin, without needles or stitches. The initial adhesive used for wound closure was based on methyl cyanoacrylate which was eventually rejected due to its potential tissue toxicity, such as inflammation or local foreign body reactions. Alternative cyanoacrylate adhesives have been used in humans and animals for both soft tissues and bone. The best known example of the use of cyanoacrylates in humans was in the Vietnam
War.
[4] In 1966 a special team was flown to Vietnam, trained and equipped to use cyanoacrylate adhesives. The use of cyanoacrylates stopped soldiers from bleeding and allowed enough time before surgery. n-butyl cyanoacrylate has been used in Europe since 1970 for a variety of surgical applications including bone and cartilage grafts, repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks, skin closures and middle ear surgery.
For many years the closure of human skin has been achieved using needles and thread. Many types of suture materials, such as cotton wool-fibre, linen, animal sinews and more recently synthetic polymers such as nylon and dacron have been used with varying success. In recent years surgeons have become increasingly interested in replacing conventional sutures with tissue adhesives for several reasons: [5]
- Ability to both bond and seal the tissue, therefore preventing seepage of body fluids.
- Rapid bonding of tissue in seconds.
- Possibility of precision bonding without deformation of the tissue.
- Possibility for improvement in the repair of tissue affected by age and disease where suture methods are difficult.
- Ability to bond and seal tissues in inaccessible areas of the body and to reduce infection.
- Tissues ( eg facial skin) closed with adhesives may only leave invisible scars and do not cause 'zipper effect' (due to the needle puncture pattern on either side of the wound) which is associated with the use of sutures.
Butyl cyanoacrylates are typically used in tissue adhesives because of their lower volatility and non-toxicity compared to methyl and ethyl cyanoacrylates. Cyanoacrylate adhesives are usually stabilised using a weak acidic inhibitor. Moisture available on the skin or in the atmosphere can neutralise the inhibitor and start anionic polymerisation reactions.
Pressure-sensitive acrylic adhesives are used for contact with skin [6] in many applications like nicotine patches and wound dressings. The main types of acrylic resins used in these systems include; 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, isooctyl acrylate or n-butyl acrylate copolymerised with polar functional monomers such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, vinyl acetate, methyl acrylate, n-vinylcaprolactam, or hydroxyethyl methacrylate. It was shown [6] that functional comonomers increase cohesive strength, provide surface polarity, and enhance wear performance.
Degree of adhesion to skin, tackiness, adhesive transfer to skin, and wear performance of the adhesive are governed by glass transition temperature, molecular weight, and viscoelastic behaviour of the adhesive. It was concluded that wear performance behaviour of acrylic adhesive tapes on skin was governed by surface energy of skin and surface energy and viscoelastic behaviour of adhesive. Polar comonomers incorporated into the adhesive formulation increased interfacial interactions with the dynamic skin surface resulting in improved adhesion during sweating when the skin surface energy is higher.
Pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) for medical applications are required to do far more than simply provide good adhesion to skin. One of the ideal requirements of medical adhesive tapes is to provide a controllable degree of adhesion to skin on demand - strong adhesion during use and ease of removal after use. This type of PSA can be used with little or no trauma to the patients. This is particularly important in elderly patients with fragile skin or repeated applications to the area of skin ( eg in ostomy devices).
Medical grade adhesives have been developed where their adhesion is 'switched off' on exposure to visible light. [7-8] A methacrylate functional PSA has been synthesised which, when blended with a visible-light curing photoinitiator, becomes light sensitive and can undergo crosslinking reaction by a free-radical mechanism of vinyl groups. This process lead to a considerable reduction (up to 90%) in peel forces of the adhesive and a change from a tacky to a less tacky, or even non-tacky, state, thereby providing the possibility of trauma-free removal.
One of the well known tissue adhesives for rapid closing of wounds and lacerations intended to replace sutures or staples is under the trade name of Indermil TM. [9] This is a clear, non-pigmented adhesive based on n-butyl cyanoacrylate. It is applied to a wound site after the edges have been carefully aligned next to each other by hand or by using skin-hooks. The adhesive polymerises within seconds to bond and seal the skin together. The application and effects of Indermil TM on closing of a wound in different stages of wound repair are shown in Fig.1.
Fig.1. Different stages of wound repair: Fig.1a) Prior to closure
Fig.1d) On day of closure
Fig.1e) Ten days after closure
Fig.1f) Three months after closure
Recently the use of UV curable bio-adhesives for tissue bonding has been reported.
[10] Advantages compared to cyanoacrylates include: improved adhesion strength and cure on demand using a UV source. Kao and co-workers
[10] prepared a series of UV curable bio-adhesives based on copolymers of N-vinyl pyrrolidone with four different comonomers:
- 2-arylamido methyl 1-propane sulphonic acid
- vinyl succinimide
- glycidyl acrylate
- 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate.
It was shown that these bio-adhesives can provide UV-induced rapid curing of about three minutes and improved adhesion values (180° peel strength of up to 4.6 N/m on porcine intestine samples). The photoinitiator used was based on hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone (C 10H 16O 2, Irgacure 184). It was also shown that the fully hydrated bio-adhesives exhibit high water uptake and equilibrium water content ranging from 20 to 100 wt%. It was suggested that the developed bio-adhesives have a strong potential for many medical applications, such as single-layered hydrogel wound dressings and as tissue adhesives.
The use of a new type of cyanoacrylate in neurosurgery, particularly in brain surgery, has also recently been reported. [11] The new adhesive contains a radio opaque agent which enables neurosurgeons to see the adhesive on an x-ray screen and apply the adhesive on the trouble spot, deep inside the brain, using minimally invasive surgical procedures without opening the skull. In this case the cyanoacrylate adhesive is used to treat a condition called arterio-venous malformation or AVM (clump of blood vessels in the brain). In some patients an AVM could burst, haemorrhaging blood into the brain and causing a stroke. During the treatment, the cyanoacrylate adhesive is delivered to the relevant spot in the brain ( Fig.2) using a catheter inserted into the patients groin inside the large artery. Neurosurgeons position one end of the catheter next to the AVM, put a small drop of surgical adhesive in the other end and push it along the tube with air pressure. The adhesive is delivered to the clump site and quickly polymerises as a result of moisture absorption from the surrounding area. As a result of curing of the adhesive, the whole clump converts to a small lump very rapidly which can no longer burst and cause a stroke. The treatment is performed in several hospitals in the UK.
Fig.2. AVM treatment using adhesive [11]
Most recently, development of a new bio-adsorbable cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesive containing bio-adsorbable copolymers has been reported. [12] The copolymers are preferably derived from:
-caprolactone, lactide and glycolide monomers or from butyl 2-cyanoacrylate, glycolide, lactide,
-caprolactone monomers. The adhesives are characterised by increased biodegradability, viscosity and flexibility. This particular cyanoacrylate adhesive is claimed to undergo biodegradation quickly with reduced formaldehyde generation as well as providing hermetic closure and hemostatic action. The bio-adsorbable adhesive may contain any suitable additives to impart the desired properties to the adhesive (
eg x-ray opacity, viscosity modifiers). The adhesive may also contain antimicrobiological agents, antibiotics, growth promoting factors, anti-cancer drugs, immune system enhancing drugs, and leachable inorganic fillers.
Fibrin
This natural, hemostatic adhesive/sealant is produced by the body at the site of any vascular injury and, therefore, has the advantage of being not only effective, but also compatible with natural healing and regenerative processes.
[13] Surgeons, faced with large numbers of casualties suffering severe blood loss, began to use fibrin during surgery for the treatment of injuries.
Although the use of fibrin-based adhesives/sealants is very old, the first commercial products prepared from pooled plasma (plasma pooled from volunteers) only became available in the 1980s. The major challenges to suppliers of pooled fibrin adhesives/sealants have been: product availability, cost, ease of use, product consistency, regulatory approval and product safety. With respect to product safety, the risk of viral transmission remains the major concern. Potential applications for fibrin adhesive/sealant include their use as a biocompatible adhesive in plastic, reconstructive or in neurosurgery as well as prevention of fluid and blood loss from burns and traumatic injuries.
Muscle adhesive protein
Muscle adhesive protein is secreted by a gland of the marine mollusc, Mytilus edulis, and other bivalves.
[13] It attaches the mollusc to rocks or other substrates in turbulent tidal zones, thereby demonstrating its powerful adhesive properties. The natural product is a protein of 120 000 dalton molecular weight that contains a repeated decapeptide rich in lysine, hydroxlated amino acids and dopa which cures rapidly in contact with water. Muscle adhesive protein has been considered for epikeratoplasty (alteration of the refractive power of cornea).
Gelatine-resorcinol-formol
Gelatine-resorcinol-formal (GRF) adhesive can be formed using gelatine, distilled water and resorcinol in the presence of heat (45°C), glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde.
[13] GRF is usually considered a tissue adhesive, particularly in the repair of acute aortic dissection in emergency surgical procedures. This adhesive can be used to eliminate the dissection plane by building the layers of aorta together and strengthening its wall to hold sutures more effectively.
Bone adhesives
Materials and applications
Considerable work has focused on the development of a new generation of adhesives which can be used in bone repair and orthopaedic surgery to replace fasteners and auxiliary devices (
eg screws, plates, wires) and avoidance of follow-on surgical operations to remove these devices. Different types of polymeric adhesives and cements (
eg acrylates, epoxies, polyurethanes) alone or in combination with naturally occurring materials (
eg fibrin) have been considered.
Total joint replacements have improved the quality of life for thousands of people over the last quarter century. Debilitating diseases such as osteo and rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, bone cancer and trauma can be treated using prostheses. The surgery reduces or eliminates pain and patients dramatically regain mobility and functionality of their joints.
An up-to-date review of bone cements and related issues has recently been published. [13] Whereas the clinical objective of joint replacement is pain relief and increased joint motion, the engineering objective is to provide as physiologic a stress as possible to the remaining bone, so that the integrity and functionality of the bone and prosthetic materials are maintained over more than 10 years service life. Materials suited for joint replacements are those that are well tolerated by the body and can withstand cyclic loading in an aggressive environment.
The most common joint to be replaced in the UK is the hip joint with approximately 50 000 hip replacements performed each year. A normal hip joint is shown in Fig.3.
Fig.3. Normal hip joint [15]
A hip joint consists of the ball shaped end of the femur fitting into a socket or acetabulum. Thus it is called a ball and socket joint and allows movement in all directions. A total hip replacement involves the removal of the femoral head at the base of the neck, the insertion of a femoral prosthesis and the enlarging of the acetabulum to receive an acetabular cup.
The mechanical properties of these materials along with those for poly(ethylene), acrylic bone cement and bone are shown in Table 1. The values of mechanical properties of bone are highly dependent on both source and conditions of testing and quoted values are approximate. It can be seen that the properties of PMMA cement are intermediate between those of cortical and cancellous bone.
Table 1: Mechanical properties of implant materials [16-17]
| Material | Young's modulus, GPa | Ultimate tensile strength, MPa | Elongation at fracture % |
| Stainless steel | 200 | 520-620 | 36-75 |
| Cobalt chromium | 200 | 440-570 | 8 |
| Titanium alloy | 100 | 550-980 | 15-20 |
| PMMA bone cement | 2-2.5 | 30-40 | 3-5 |
| UHMW polyethylene | 0.5-1 | 20-30 | 200-400 |
Bone, femur (compact) longitudinal tangential | 25 12 | 150-200 50-100 | 3 1 |
| Spongy bone | 0.1 | 10 | 3-5 |
Bone fracture fixation and associated techniques
Development of a permanent fixation mechanism of implants to bone has been one of the most formidable challenges in the evolution of joint replacement. There are three types of fixation methods:
- Mechanical interlock, achieved by press fitting the implant, [18] by using PMMA as a grouting agent, [19] or by using threaded components. [19]
- Biological fixation using textured or porous surfaces which allow bone to grow into the interstices. [20]
- Direct chemical bonding between implant and bone eg coating the implant with HA. [21]
The most common method of securing prostheses, particularly in patients over 60 years of age, is to use autopolymerising PMMA bone cement. [22] This cement is mixed in surgery until it becomes a doughy consistency. It is inserted into the cavity between the prosthetic stem and the cortical bone of the femoral shaft, where completion of the polymerisation takes place. The implant is secured by mechanical interdigitation between the cement and (trabecular) bone, illustrated in Fig.4a.
Fig.4: a) Idealised cemented interface; b) Idealised porous ingrowth interface
Fixation with bone cement creates bone-cement and cement-implant interfaces, and loosening may occur at either one. Problems may arise from intrinsic factors such as the properties of PMMA and bone, as well as the extrinsic factors such as the cementing techniques.
As an alternative to cemented fixation, in an attempt to improve the long term performance of hip replacements, particularly in young patients, uncemented fixation relies upon the biological tissues ingrowing into the porous outer layer of the prosthesis to achieve a mechanical interlock. Figure 4b shows a fully ingrown uncemented prosthesis. Bioactive ceramic coatings such as hydroxyapatite, are used to encourage bone ingrowth right into the porous coating.
Characteristics of bone cement
Poly(methylmethacrylate) is an amorphous polymer, hard and brittle at room temperature, with a glass transition temperature of 105-120°C. This forms the main matrix ingredient of bone cement. The greater proportion of the cured cement, approximately 70%wt, consists of preformed polymeric beads, which usually come in the form of a powder of PMMA. Benzoyl peroxide is also present in small amounts, up to 2wt% in the majority of powders, acting as the initiator for polymerisation. In order to obtain the doughy, easily manipulated material, the powder is mixed with the liquid component consisting primarily of methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer, 97vol%. The structure of the methyl methacrylate monomer unit is shown in Fig.5a.
Fig.5: a) Methacrylate unit; b) BPO; c) DMPT
Despite alterations to the basic PMMA powder composition, the reaction mechanism which occurs remains the same. Polymerisation proceeds as a result of the redox reaction which occurs between the initiator benzoyl peroxide (BPO, Fig.5b) present in the polymer powder and the accelerator, N-N-dimethyl-p-toluidine (DMPT, Fig.5c) included in the monomer liquid.
Polymerisation of the monomer is an exothermic reaction and the temperature in the centre of the bone cement can exceed 100°C. A typical temperature versus time profile is displayed in Fig.6. Time is recorded from when the liquid monomer is added to the polymer powder. Setting times and peak temperatures are not included in Fig.5 since they vary greatly for each commercially produced cement.
Fig.6. Temperature-time profile for bone cement [15]
The time relationship between the physical and chemical processes occurring are of importance to the orthopaedic surgeon. The surgeon has approximately seven minutes of working time to mix the cement and inject it through a cement gun into the body. Alterations in processing such as pressurisation, vacuum mixing, centrifugation or fibre reinforcement must be implemented within the constraint of this working time. Once injected, the cement must be able to penetrate into the interstices of trabecular bone.
On the temperature profile shown in Fig.5 the dough time is indicated. This is the time from initial mixing when the cement no longer adheres to a gloved finger placed into the mixture and is the time when surgeons can start to insert the cement. The working time is the period during which the bone cement mixture remains doughy or workable. The limit of this period, the time it takes for cement to reach the mid point between the peak and ambient temperature, is known as the setting time and is used as a comparison for differences in setting characteristics of the various commercial cements.
Commercial bone cements
There are a number of commercially produced bone cements used in surgery at present which include, Surgical Simplex P, Palacos R, CMW (Type 13), Zimmer (Regular and Low viscosity) and Sulfix. [14] For each of these cements, the powder to liquid ratio is approximately 2:1 by weight and is supplied in 40g packets of powder and 29g vials of monomer. The cements do not always contain pure PMMA beads and MMA monomer, but deviate significantly from this composition to provide the bone cement properties required. The various modifications include the addition of radiopaque material usually barium sulphate (BaSO 4) or zirconium dioxide (ZrO 2), the initiator BPO and the accelerator DMPT. In the case of CMW and Zimmer there is also the option of low viscosity for use with a cement gun. The cement compositions have been changed over the years and are usually a well guarded secret of the manufacturers, so the values quoted in Table 2 may not reflect the compositions of the cements used today.
Table 2: Composition of common commercial bone cements [15]
| Cement type | Polymer composition | Amount of BPO/wt% | Monomer composition | Amount of DMPT/wt% |
| Simplex P | MMA styrene co-polymer + PMMA + BaSO 4 | 1.94 | MMA | 2.62 |
| CMW | PMMA + BaSO 4 | Type 1 and 2 Type 3 | 2.05 2.00 | MMA | Type 1 and 2 Type 3 | 0.82 2.49 |
| Palacos R | Methylacrylate co-polymer + ZrO 2 | 0.5 | MMA | 2.14 |
| Zimmer | PMMA + BaSO 4 | 0.75 | MMA | 2.75 |
| Sulfix | PMMA + poly (butyl methacrylate) + ZrO 2 | 0.84 | MMA + nBMA | 1.96 |
Some of the important cement mechanical properties are given in Table 3. These results were obtained by a variety of methods, thus making it difficult to obtain a comprehensive chart of all properties of interest which can be directly compared.
A new research project has started at TWI and Cambridge University [14] to develop and assess the new generation of bone cements. The main aim is to develop an injectable bone cement for fracture fixation. A range of methacrylate materials and bioactive fillers will be investigated with appropriate rheological, structural, mechanical and biological characterisation.
Table 3: Mechanical properties of common commercial bone cements (adapted from ref. [17] )
| Cement type | Simplex P | CMW | Palacos R | Zimmer | Sulfix |
| Tensile strength, MPa | 25.0-37.1 | 24.5-61 | 46.2-64.9 | 25.2 | 49.0 |
| Compressive strength, MPa | 66-88 | 85-93 | 90 | 80.5-85 | 93.5 |
| Flexural strength, MPa | 82.2 | 73 | 84.6 | 70 | - |
| Young's modulus, GPa | 1.3-3.4 | 2.2-2.8 | 2.4-2.7 | 0.45-2.4 | 2.5 |
| Elongation to failure, % | 1.4-4.6 | - | 2.2 | - | 2.4 |
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Henkel/Loctite UK, 3M UK, Chemence and Degussa UK for providing some of the photographs and information.
Adhesives and sealants in medicine, dentistry and pharmacy - a review of materials and applications - Part II
References
| N° | Author | Title | |
| 1 | Tavakoli S M: | 'The adhesive bonding of medical devices'. Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry June 2001 58-73. | Return to text |
| 2 | Tavakoli S M: | 'Sticking to the healthy option - using adhesive bonding in medical and implantable devices - part 1'. TWI Bulletin 2001 42 (3) 35-37. | |
| 3 | Tavakoli S M: | 'Sticking to the healthy option - using adhesive bonding in medical and implantable devices - part 2'. TWI Bulletin 2001 42 (4) 65-68. | |
| 4 | Frye A: | 'Can you really use super glue instead of suture?' www.fensende.com/users/swnymph/refs/glue.html (This link not available on 21 Feb .2002 but the file is available from the Google cache: Can We Really Use Super Glue Instead of Suture?) | Return to text |
| 5 | Alan C R: | 'Medical adhesives'. Adhesive Technology 4 June 1998. | Return to text |
| 6 | Kenney J F et al: | 'Medical-grade acrylic adhesives for skin contact'. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 1992 45 355-361. | |
| 7 | Webster I: | 'The development of a pressure sensitive adhesive for trauma-free removal'. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 1999 19 29-34. | Return to text |
| 8 | Webster I: | International patent WO 99/18136, 15.04.99. | Return to text |
| 9 | | Indermil: Tissue adhesive, a translucent medical adhesive for closing wounds and lacerations. Technical Data Sheet, Loctite/Henkel Corporation. | Return to text |
| 10 | Kao F J and Manivannan G: | 'Copolymers of N-vinyl pyrrolidone'. Journal of Biomedical Materials Reviews, 1997 38 (3) 191-196. | |
| 11 | Glaskin M: | 'Surgeons with sticking power'. The Sunday Times 9 April 2000. | |
| 12 | Kotzev D L: | Bio-adsorbable cyanoacrylate adhesives. US Patent 6224622 May 1 2001. | Return to text |
| 13 | Sierra D and Saltz R: | 'Surgical adhesives and sealants current technology and applications'. Technomic Publishing Company 1996. | |
| 14 | Rahman F F: | 'Biocements for the joining of bone'. Report submitted for the Certificate of Postgraduate Study at the University of Cambridge. | |
| 15 | Hardinge K: | 'Hip replacements, the facts'. Oxford University Press 1983. | |
| 16 | Weightman B et al: | 'The mechanical properties of cement and loosening of the femoral component of hip replacements'. J Bone and Joint Surgery 1987 69 558 564. | Return to text |
| 17 | Harper E J: | 'Development and characterisation of a hydroxyapatite reinforced poly (ethylmethacrylate) bone cement'. PhD Thesis, University of London, 1996. | |
| 18 | Cameron H U: | 'Smooth metal-bone interface'. R Hurley (ed) Bone Implant Interface, St Louis Mosby 1994 a 121-144. | Return to text |
| 19 | Park S H et al: | 'Hard tissue replacements'. Bronzino J D (ed) The Biomedical Engineering Handbook CRC Press 1995 672-690. | |
| 20 | Cameron H U: | 'The implant-bone interface porous materials'. R Hurley (ed) Bone Implant Interface St Louis Mosby 1994 b 145-168. | Return to text |
| 21 | Morscher E W: | 'Current status of acetabular fixation in primary total hip arthoplasty'. Clin Orthop 274:172 1992. | Return to text |
| 22 | Malchau H, Herberts P and Ahnfelt L: | 'Progression of total hip replacement in Sweden'. Acta Orthop Scand 1993 64 497-506. |