Promising results from hybrid laser-arc work ... ideal for thin auto sheet
TWI Bulletin, November/December 2007
Chris gained his Natural Sciences degree from the University of Cambridge then completed a doctorate in the area of Materials Science at the University of Oxford. Following postdoctoral research, he worked for two years as a project leader at Corus in rolled aluminium products, before joining TWI in 2002. Since then, he has specialised in the project management and delivery of laser welding projects for a range of TWI's clients, primarily in the aerospace, shipbuilding, defence, and automotive sectors.
Episode one of Chris Allen's hybrid arc-laser work, published in September, examined his approach to the project, the equipment involved, his experimental methods and the optimisation of individual parameters. Part two looks at the results, discussion and conclusions to be drawn from his work.
Results and discussion
Autogenous laser melt runs
With He top bead shielding of 20l/min, at travel speeds of 3 and 4m/min, melt-through occurred in a few positions ('pinholes') along the weld length. At a travel speed of 5m/min, a consistent top and underbead was achieved. At travel speeds of 6 and 7m/min penetration was lost.
Switching to 20l/min Ar top bead shielding, all welds produced exhibited a brighter top bead appearance, being more effectively shielded against oxidation due to the greater density of Ar compared to He. At a travel speed of 3m/min, pinholes occurred. At travel speeds of 4 and 5m/min consistent top beads and underbeads were achieved, with the reduced heat input at 5m/min being preferred. This condition was selected as optimum and repeated three times to check consistency. Fig.1 shows a cross-section through one of these melt runs, whose profile was acceptable to the highest class, class B (stringent), according to BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. Radiography of these melt runs also indicated an internal quality acceptable to class B (stringent) of BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. At higher travel speeds, of 6, 7 and 8m/min, penetration became intermittent.
Fig.1. Cross section through an autogenous laser melt run produced at 5m/min with a laser power of 3kW and with Ar shielding
Autogenous laser butt welds
The optimum laser melt run condition was transferred to a nominal zero gap butt weld between sheets with machined edges. At 5m/min a narrower top bead was observed than when performing a melt run, and some localised losses in penetration were observed. Reduction in travel speed by 10%, ie to 4.5m/min, increased penetration and top bead width. This condition was again repeated three times to check consistency. Fig.2 shows a cross-section through one of these butt welds. The weld profile was again acceptable to class B (stringent), as was the internal weld quality as determined by radiography.
Fig.2. Cross section through an autogenous laser butt weld produced at 4.5m/min with a laser power of 3kW and with Ar shielding
AC MIG melt runs
For AC MIG melt runs, the slotted torch shroud to be used for hybrid experiments was found unsuitable, therefore a conventional shroud improving both melt pool shielding and arc stability, was used. Similarly, arc stability was much improved using Ar as a shielding gas, with an electrode stick out and shroud stand off of 10mm, compared to using He as a shielding gas, and an electrode stick out and shroud stand off of 15mm. Varying both arc current setting in increments of 10A (without voltage trim being applied) and travel speed in increments of 0.25m/min, the most stable condition was found to be 50A at 1m/min. Penetration was less consistent than for the laser melt runs. Faster travel speeds resulted in loss of arc stability, and higher currents resulted in melt through.
In a second round of trials voltage trim was applied. The condition that gave a stable arc at the highest welding speed achieved was using an arc current set to 80A at 2m/min, with a voltage trim of +2 or +3. This indicates that the application of a positive trim stabilises the arc to both higher currents and welding speeds. Top bead and underbead photographs from an AC MIG arc melt run at 2m/min with an arc current set to 80A with a +3 trim arc are shown in Fig.3.
Fig.3. Top bead and underbead of selected AC MIG alone melt run condition at 2m/min travel speed, using a mean arc current set to 80A, with voltage trim set to +3
a) Top bead
b) Underbead
Penetration was more consistent than that achieved when using a 50A arc current, untrimmed, at 1m/min, but still not fully consistent, as is shown. In terms of weld profile, and particularly internal quality (porosity), this meltrun was not acceptable to BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. Weldments can tolerate an appreciable amount of porosity, that amount being material and alloy dependant, without significantly affecting static mechanical properties such as yieldstrength, and tensile strength and elongation being reduced as cross-section area is reduced. This philosophy, of the acceptance of a certain porosity level, is commonly taken in the automotive industry, where expensive,time-consuming, and difficult to apply pre-welding aluminium cleaning treatments to reduce weld porosity levels are not the norm. That said, reduced porosity levels in both AC MIG and hybrid laser-AC MIG welds can be achieved with moreattention to material cleaning.
Hybrid melt runs
- Basic conditions Combining the arc and laser, with the AC MIG melt run conditions (initially, those developed without voltage trim) but at the optimum laser melt run travel speed, successfully resulted in a stable arc at much higher speeds than without the laser. However, the increase in heat input led to melt through. A variety of higher travel speeds and arc current settings (all without voltage trim) was tried to find a stable condition which led to consistent penetration without melt through, resulting in an optimum condition at 7.6m/min with a mean arc current set to 80-90A. This represented a ~50% increase in welding speed compared with autogenous laser welding, and just over three and a half times faster than the fastest condition established when using the AC MIG arc on its own.
- Effect of penetration control trim In an effort to increase welding speed further, the penetration trim control was also adjusted on the arc power set. Penetration trim control settings were chosen between a minimum of arbitrary denomination '-5' to a setting of '+3' (maximum possible setting was '+5'). These adjustments change the EN ratio of the AC current, although the magnitudes of these changes in EN ratio were not recorded.
Penetration control trims were applied to a reference melt run condition of mean arc current of 80A (with zero voltage trim) at a travel speed of 8m/min. Unlike the reported effect of penetration control trim on AC MIG welds, no such effect was seen in the hybrid melt runs. This was probably due to the dominance of the laser over the arc, in terms of achieving penetration, at the high speeds used in these experiments.
- Effect of reducing laser power Melt runs were performed at lower travel speeds with reduced laser powers, to determine the minimum laser power required to stabilise the arc, and up to what speed that arc would be stabilised. All experiments were performed with a mean arc current set to 80A with zero voltage trim. These experiments are summarised in Fig.4. As Fig.4 shows, 1kW of laser power stabilised the arc at 1.5m/min, representing a 50% increase on the welding speed of 1m/min achieved without the laser (shown as the 'arc alone' point in Fig.4). However, a trimmed 80A arc, as reported above, was stable to 2m/min. At these modest welding speeds, voltage trim appears to be a far more 'economic' means of stabilising the arc than adding a low power (1kW) focused laser source.
Fig.4. Hybrid laser-arc melt run conditions, as a function of whether a stable arc was achieved, with laser powers <3kW, and with the two best hybrid conditions achieved with 3kW, and the best condition using the AC-MIG arc on its own also included. All results without voltage trim
Effect of voltage trim As with AC MIG melt runs, the application of voltage trim stabilises the arc to higher currents and welding speeds. With a welding speed of 8.2m/min, the arc was stabilised to a mean current setting of 110A with a voltage trim of +3. This represents a welding speed increase of up to 80% compared with laser welding, and a ~40% current increase compared to an untrimmed hybrid setting. Top bead and underbead photographs from this hybrid melt run are shown in Fig.5. The profile of this particular melt run was to class C (intermediate) in accordance with BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. However, as with the AC MIG melt runs, internal porosity was not accepted to BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001, and a separate fitness for purpose assessment would be required.
Fig.5. Top bead and underbead of selected hybrid melt run condition at 8.2m/min, with mean arc current set to 110A, and with a voltage trim of +3
a) Top bead
b) Underbead
Hybrid edge lap welds
- Basic conditions For edge lap welding, as a start point the same conditions (without voltage trim) and travel angles were used as for hybrid melt runs. Initially, a work angle of 20° off vertical was used but this led to penetration of the underlying sheet. The work angle was therefore increased to 40° off vertical, the maximum possible given the diameter of MIG shroud used, with the laser focused on to the top surface of the lower sheet and the MIG wire aimed in to the corner of the joint. This also resulted in penetration of the underlying sheet. To avoid penetration a series of further experiments indicated that it was necessary to increase travel speed to 8.6m/min, reduce laser power to 2.8kW, and, to counteract the resulting loss in arc stability, increase the mean arc current set to 110A. Top bead and underbead photographs from a hybrid edge lap weld with these conditions, shown in Fig.6-7, shows a cross-section through this lap weld.
Fig.6. Top bead and underbead of hybrid lap weld welded at 8.6m/min, with a mean arc current set to 110A, without voltage trim, and using a laser power of 2.8kW
a) Top bead
Fig.7. Cross section through a hybrid lap weld at a travel speed of 8.6m/min, with a mean arc current set to 110A, without voltage trim, and using a laser power of 2.8kW
Effect of voltage trim Using the above conditions, applying a positive voltage trim of setting +3 further stabilised the arc, for example to current settings of up to 130A at a travel speed of 8.2m/min. It was found necessary to position the wire 2mm out of the joint line of the edge lap joint line on the underlying sheet to maintain a regular top bead appearance. This was probably due to preferential arcing along the shortest path,
ie on to the top corner of the upper sheet, which occurred when the wire was positioned pointing directly at the joint line. With these increased arc current conditions penetration of the lower sheet occurred once again. In an attempt to reduce penetration, the travel speed was increased to 8.6m/min, however, this destabilised the arc. A more successful method was to reduce the laser power to 2.9kW. The fact that small (<10%) changes in process parameters led to large differences in process stability and weld profile does indicate that the operating window of this process is relatively small. This condition was repeated three times to check consistency. Top bead and underbead photographs from one of these hybrid lap welds, shown in
Fig.8-9, shows a cross-section through this lap weld. As with the hybrid melt runs reported above, the radiographs of these welds contained a number of fine pores, with a mean maximum diameter of ~0.3mm. As noted before, the presence of this porosity would necessitate a fitness for purpose assessment, rather than simple adherence to a standard of workmanship. It is anticipated that reduced levels of porosity could be achieved by more stringent parent material preparation prior to welding, but this was not considered to be representative of the preparation that would be carried out routinely in the automotive industry, at whom this work had been targeted.
Fig.8b) Underbead of a hybrid lap weld at a travel speed of 8.2m/min, with a mean arc current set to 130A, with a voltage trim of +3, and using a laser power of 2.9kW
Fig.9. Cross sections through a hybrid lap weld at a travel speed of 8.2m/min, with a mean arc current set to 130A, with a voltage trim of +3, and using a laser power of 2.9kW
- Gap bridging Edge lap welds were made using the hybrid condition developed, with tapered gaps between the sheets both starting at zero and running to a nominal gap of 2mm, and from a nominal gap of 2mm running to zero gap. These welds were then compared with equivalent autogenous laser welds made at the same travel speed. Table 2 summarises the gap bridging results, with the actual gap sizes being determined by feeler gauge and/or cross-sectioning.
Table 2. Gap bridging results for edge lap welds made by the hybrid laser-AC MIG process and the autogenous laser process
| Weld type | Nominal gap | Gap bridging* until |
| Hybrid laser-AC MIG | 0-2mm | ~0.9mm |
| Hybrid laser-AC MIG | 2-0mm | ~1.1mm |
| Autogenous laser | 0-2mm | ~0.1mm |
| Autogenous laser | 2-0mm | Determined by feeler gauge to be <0.1mm |
As Table 2 shows, in the case of the hybrid welds, with a gap increasing from zero, bridging was maintained to a gap size of ~1mm, and with a gap tapering down to zero, gap bridging was first achieved at a gap size also of ~1mm. With larger gap sizes holes appeared in the top bead. In the autogenous laser welding process gap bridging was lost at a value ten times as small at ~0.1mm. The hybrid process is therefore far better in terms of gap bridging in the case of this joint geometry. This large difference arose from the supply of extra weld metal material from the MIG wire consumable. A laser with cold wire feed would be more tolerant than the autogenous process, but welding speeds would have to be reduced to allow the laser to not only melt the parent material but the wire as well. The hybrid process has the advantage that arc energy, not laser, is effectively used to melt the wire.
Hybrid butt welds
- Basic conditions For butt welding, as a start point the same conditions (without voltage trim) were again used as for hybrid melt runs. With these conditions penetration was heavier, and localised melt-through occurred in one position. Increasing welding speed to 8.4m/min still led to localised melt through, and higher speeds led to loss of penetration.
- Effect of voltage trim, heat input, process separation and laser defocus position Following on from earlier work, a +3 voltage trim was selected. However, this again resulted in localised melt-through. Reducing heat input by increasing speed and/or reducing laser power reduced, but could not entirely eliminate, the occurrence of these localised melt-throughs. Different laser-arc separations of 0mm and 4mm were tried, but without success, and in the case of a 4mm separation arc stability was lost. Different laser defocus positions of +2mm and +4mm were also tried, but led to loss of penetration. The origin of these localised melt throughs, or pinholes, may result from short time scale (<20ms) variations in any one of the following:
- Arc power: short term variations in the arc were indeed measured using high frequency monitoring equipment.
- Wire feed rate: consistent high speed feeding of soft aluminium wires during arc welding is a documented problem.
- Laser power arriving at and absorbed by the work: as opposed to variations in output power, these would more likely be fluctuations in power arriving at or absorbed by the work ( eg due to fluctuations in the laser plume or keyhole).
- A 'random event' occurring in the weld pool ( eg sudden localised build up of porosity).
Whatever the cause, these hole features were not seen at the low speeds used when using the arc on its own, where short time instabilities may be better accommodated due to the longer freezing time/slower solidification velocity. Nor were they seen in hybrid melt runs or non fully penetrating butt welds, where the weld pool may be slightly better supported, due to the absence of any abutting edges, or underlying non-melted material respectively.
Conclusions
The hybrid Nd:YAG laser-AC MIG welding process benefits, (and limitations), for joining 1.2mm thick sheets of 5251-H22 aluminium alloy have been quantified for both butt welding and edge lap welding. The main conclusions of thiswork are:
- The Nd:YAG laser and AC MIG welding processes can be successfully combined in a hybrid process suitable for high speed welding of thin sheet aluminium for automotive body construction.
- Hybrid welding at speeds of over 8m/min at 3kW laser power has been achieved; over four times faster than the AC MIG arc on its own, and up to 80% faster than autogenous laser welding.
- The application of a positive voltage trim stabilises the AC MIG arc to currents greater than 50% higher than without trim.
- When hybrid edge lap welding, gaps of up to 1mm between 1.2mm thickness sheets can be bridged, ten times those tolerated by equivalent autogenous laser welding process.
- An assessment of fitness for purpose of the welds made using this process would need to be made on a case by case basis. Attention to material cleanliness may be required to reduce the observed porosity levels, if indeed these prove unacceptable for a given application.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Industrial Members of TWI as part of the TWI Core Research Program.
