[Skip to content]

TWI
Search our Site
.

Practical measurement of voltage and current in arc welding

TWI Bulletin, April 1985

by John Street

John Street is Principal Research Engineer in the Control Engineering Department.

This practical guide to measurement of arc current and voltage, also discusses sources of error and methods of dealing with them so that their effects are minimised.


Arc voltage and welding current are two of the major variables that need to be controlled in fusion welding processes. Where current and voltage meters are incorporated into arc welding equipment their accuracy may be checked in situ by specially designed reference sources. [1] If integral meters are not fitted, which is often the case in industry, the important welding parameters may be set up and checked with instrumentation developed to be used without disturbing the welder or the welding equipment. [2,3]

All physical measurements are subject to error, however, so it is still possible to obtain apparently conflicting results from different instruments when measuring identical parameters. Welding engineers or investigators need to be aware of the sources of error, be able to assess their magnitude, and know how to deal with them when presenting experimental results.

A first step in the right direction is to measure the variables correctly. A simple and practical guide to measuring arc voltage and current is given below.

Arc voltage

Where to measure voltage

True arc voltage is the potential difference between the opposite ends of the arc. The value normally but incorrectly described as arc voltage is that measured by connection to the workpiece and electrode at conveniently accessible points ( Fig.1).

Fig.1. Measurement of 'arc voltage' between electrode and workpiece
Fig.1. Measurement of 'arc voltage' between electrode and workpiece

Measurement at the welding set adds any circuit voltage drops to the true arc voltage, and is to be avoided at all costs. (The errors can easily exceed 10%, and may be greater than 25%)

How to measure voltage

Manual metal arc (MMA) welding

Ideally, one lead should be connected directly to the electrode core wire. In practice, connection to the electrode gripper or to a sharp conducting probe pushed through the cable insulation will add only a small, constant, error. The other lead is attached to the workpiece, preferably away from the workpiece connection. Take care to make good electrical contact by removal of oxide, grease, etc.

MIG and submerged arc (SA) welding

A brush in light electrical contact with the consumable wire makes the ideal 'live' connection but in practice the contact may have to be made at the contact tip or body of the welding gun.

TIG welding

Direct contact with the tungsten electrode may be made via a small screw in a threaded hole in the torch body, taking care to insulate exposed conducting surfaces. For MIG, TIG and SA welding, the 'earthy' connection is as described for MMA. Do not allow high voltages for are starting to reach the instrumentation.

Welding current

Where to measure current

Welding current should be measured in the cable which runs most directly between the welding set and the arc. ( Fig.2)

Fig.2. Measurement of current in cable running between welding set and arc
Fig.2. Measurement of current in cable running between welding set and arc

Where this is not possible, measure current in the return cable between workpiece and welding set ( Fig.3) taking care not to include current appropriate to any other welding set.

Fig.3. Measurement of current in return cable between workpiece and welding set
Fig.3. Measurement of current in return cable between workpiece and welding set

When measuring here, beware unintended current paths which may result in misleading readings. For instance, leakage current may flow through safety earth connections attached to the workpiece ( Fig.4)

Fig.4. Possible leakage path from workplace, resulting in misleading readings when measuring current between workplace and welding set
Fig.4. Possible leakage path from workplace, resulting in misleading readings when measuring current between workplace and welding set

Return current paths may also exist through traverses, work handling devices and cables attached between the workpiece and other welding sets. Leakage currents can be a large proportion of the welding current (as much as 50A in 170A has been observed) and may vary unpredictably during welding.

How to measure current

Resistive shunt and meter, for DC (Fig. 5) - Take care to use a matched combination of meter and shunt, ensuring that the shunt does not come into electrical contact with earth or any other electrical circuit. Do not use two or more shunts in parallel for high current, or two or more shunts in series for low currents.

Fig.5. Resistive shunt and meter for measuring DC welding currents
Fig.5. Resistive shunt and meter for measuring DC welding currents

Current transformer and meter, for AC only (Fig.6) - The current transformer is inductively coupled to the welding cable which is passed through its centre.

Fig.6. Current transformer and meter for measuring AC current
Fig.6. Current transformer and meter for measuring AC current
  1. A matched meter must be used with it. It must never be used without a matched meter or other load, or it may be destroyed.


  2. Hall-effect current transducer, for AC and DC - This type of transducer may be bolted into the welding circuit or clipped over a welding cable, according to type. It requires electronic circuitry to produce a signal for the current display, but gives electrical isolation from the welding circuit. Correct choice gives a high frequency response if required.

What indicating instruments to use

DC measurement

The current or voltage to be measured may be displayed on a moving-coil meter, on a digital meter or on a chart recorder.

Voltage

Voltage measurements require a suitable series resistor to obtain an appropriate full scale range. This is often integral with the instrument used, and may be switch selected for range ( Fig.7).

Fig.7. Voltmeter with series resistor to obtain appropriate full scale range for voltage measurement
Fig.7. Voltmeter with series resistor to obtain appropriate full scale range for voltage measurement
When a digital readout is used, a sufficiently long time constant (0.5-1.0 sec) must be incorporated to average short term fluctuations of the value to be measured.

Current

Current measurements are obtained by taking a small known fraction of the welding current ( Fig.5) which is then displayed as for voltage.

AC measurements

Voltage

The voltage signal is obtained as for DC but measured as the average (or mean) of its rectified value. A moving-iron meter (hot-wire or thermocouple also) is suitable.

Current

The signal to be measured is obtained as previously described and displayed as for voltage, above. If rms indicating devices are used for sinusoidal waveforms the conversion, mean = 0.9 x rms, must be made. Avometers give rms readout, TWI arc welding instruments (Briefcase monitors [1] ) give the average.

Non-sinusoidal waveforms require special techniques of measurement. With AC welding, arc voltage is approximately square wave, and welding current sinusoidal.

Errors

Inherent system errors

A measuring system can never be totally accurate. Current shunts, meters, signal processing and conditioning circuits, etc, all contribute an inaccuracy, or error, expressed as a tolerance, ± 2.5%. The error can be quantified and is usually stated by the manufacturer.

Deciding the overall measurement accuracy required is important because over specification may result in disproportionate extra cost of instrumentation, while under specification could lead to welding errors requiring costly repair. For instance, if ± 5% is good enough for arc welding current values, then a transducer and display of ± 1 % accuracy ( i.e. nearly an order of magnitude better) will be generally satisfactory.

Also important is that individual system components should be selected to be of comparable accuracy, i.e. use a ± 5% ammeter with a ± 5% current shunt. For example, measurements from a ± 2% shunt would be degraded appreciably by a ± 5% meter, while a ± 0.5% meter would still be at least ± 2% in error.

Measuring instruments can have initial calibration errors, and they are also subject to drift with time, temperature, and other environmental factors.

Digital multimeters, of the type commonly used in laboratories, are probably subject to ± 1% error even if a larger number of digits is shown. For example 1.263V 0n a 1.999 meter is probably only reliable to 1.26V, or the second decimal place.

Good analogue meters should have error no worse than ± 2% 0n DC, 0r ± 4% otherwise. (The degree of uncertainty is marked on the scale as a percentage of full scale). This assumes that they are read correctly. Oscilloscope measurements can be in error by much more: ± 4% is quite good, ± 10% is not uncommon, particularly if the instrument has not been calibrated recently.

Errors contributed by elements or subsystems of a measurement system should be combined by normal statistical methods, unless one error is dominant (more than three times any other), in which case it alone may be considered.

Combining errors

Suppose that a value of Z is to be calculated from two independent measured values, A and B. If the errors for A and B are ± Δ A and ± Δ B, respectively, the total error band for Z will depend on how it is related to A and B:

a) If Z = A + B or Z = A - B then

( ΔZ) 2 = ( ΔA) 2 + ( ΔB) 2 ,

where ΔZ is the rms of the absolute errors.

b) If Z = AB or Z =

b2641e1.gif

then

b2641e2.gif

where ΔZ is the rms of the percentage errors.

In real life, if one of the errors that apply to a measurement is more than twice any other, then the largest error can be taken as the overall error.

Sometimes the errors in A and B are not independent of each other and more involved manipulation is needed to account for them.

Dealing with errors

Avoid parallax when reading meters and remember that the stated accuracy of meters and chart recorders is a percentage of full scale deflection (fsd) at reading, e.g. a meter scaled to 1000A fsd, of 2.5% accuracy, may have an error of ± 25A at reading. It is therefore important not to measure small values with respect to fsd, but to read in the upper half of the scale.

Magnetic or electric fields from welding sets/cables can adversely affect readings [4] so care should be taken in positioning instruments. Instrument tolerances are quoted at 20°C under standard test conditions. A change of temperature of 10°C may contribute a further 1.5% to the error of the readings of a 1.5% accuracy meter, so this must be guarded against, as must operation at an angle other than that for which the instrument was designed.

Quantities which are to be compared with each other should always be quoted with an error band, e.g. 94 ±4 Ω (or ±4%). Thus 94 ±1 Ω differs significantly from 97 ± 1 Ω, while 94 ± 4 Ω and 97 ± 4 Ω are probably not different 'within experimental error'.

The error band is particularly important when comparing a measured quantity with a theoretical calculation, a 'known' value or with another independently measured value.

An unnecessary number of decimal places should not be stated in a final report. For example, if a voltage measured as 5.32V is subject to an error ± 0.02V, it should be rounded to 5.3V. The errors themselves do not have to be quoted accurately; one significant figure is usually sufficient. They can be expressed as either absolute or as percentage errors.

The Welding Institute makes a range of instrumentation for arc welding. Members with specific enquiries should contact J A Street.


References

Author Title  
1 Street J A: '"Man in a van": a service for on-site checking of arc welding instrumentation.' Welding Institute Research Bulletin 1983 24 (6) 181-184.  
2   'A portable monitor for arc welding.' Welding Institute Research Bulletin 1983 24 (4) 114-115. Return to text
3 Street J A: 'Portable printing arc welding monitor aids procedure set-up and QA.' Welding Institute Research Bulletin 1984 25 (1) 14-17.  
4 Perryman R A G: 'Am I interfering with you? - guidelines on grounding and shielding.' Welding Institute Research Bulletin 1985 26 (3) 92-95 Return to text