[Skip to content]

TWI
Search our Site
.

Strain ageing of weld metals tensile test behaviour

TWI Bulletin, July/August 1988

Norman Bailey
Norman Bailey
Norman Bailey, BMet, CEng, FIM, FWeldI, is a Principal Research Metallurgist in the Materials Department.

Strain ageing behaviour of steels in general has always been demonstrated most dramatically by the jerky flow or serrated yielding seen in tensile tests at moderately elevated temperatures. Before starting a current project on the significance of strain ageing behaviour of weld metals likely to be used for the as-welded repair of pressure vessels, some preliminary tests were undertaken to see whether tensile testing could be used as a simple sorting test to assess the relative susceptibility to strain ageing of different consumables.


Strain ageing is a form of hardening and embrittlement which, in steels, is caused by an interaction between dislocations and the interstitially dissolved elements nitrogen and carbon. [1,2] At moderately elevated temperatures, atoms of these elements, unless fixed as stable nitrides or carbides, diffuse to dislocations and hinder their movement. This interaction increases strength and hardness but decreases ductility. Under certain conditions, the locked dislocation can be freed by increasing the stress and then lock again, giving the typical saw toothed profile to load-extension curves in tensile [1,2] and even fracture toughness [3] tests. Even at room temperature, strain ageing can take place slowly, and advantage can be taken of this to form sheet steel made from rimming steel so that it subsequently hardens to the required strength levels.

When strain ageing behaviour is observed during elevated temperature testing, i.e. when straining and ageing are simultaneous, it is termed dynamic strain ageing. Susceptible steels can be embrittled either by such simultaneous straining and ageing or by ambient temperature straining followed by subsequent ageing. In either case toughness is impaired at ambient temperature and below. In terms of welds, such so-called static strain ageing used to be a serious problem when semi-killed steels were common, as it led to poor toughness in the sub-critical heat affected zone (HAZ). Indeed, the original form of the wide plate test was notched into this region because it was usually the least tough region of the HAZ. [4]

Modern steels usually contain sufficient aluminium so that in most heat treated conditions the nitrogen is combined as aluminium nitride (AlN, which contains about twice as much aluminium as nitrogen, by weight). Hence strain ageing of the steels after welding is nowadays not a serious problem. Unfortunately, because excessive amounts of aluminium can prevent achieving tough, as-welded microstructures in many systems, [5] most weld metals are low in aluminium and are thus potentially susceptible to strain ageing.

Indeed, strain ageing is one of the reasons why toughness of the root runs of multipass welds can be low, particularly if the welds are not strongly restrained to prevent the root regions deforming while they are still warm. [6] However, other factors need to be taken into account. One is that, in multipass welds, some nitrogen is likely to be precipitated as nitrides by the complex heat treatment cycle imposed by subsequent runs. Another factor is that weld metals contain a much higher dislocation density than plate steels, [7] so that more nitrogen might well be needed to produce serious embrittlement than the 10ppm or so needed in a plate steel. [1,2]

Table 1 Welding conditions for test welds

Weld metal Mn-Ni-Mo C-Mn
Electrode type (AWS) A5.5 E8016-C3 A5.1 E7018-1
Electrode diameter, mm 4.0 4.0
Welding position vertical up overhead
Welding current, A 120 160
Pre-voltage, V 22 22-23
Polarity electrode positive electrode positive
Arc energy, kJ/mm 1.3-1.6 1.0-1.7
Max depth of repair, mm 60 30
Electrode drying temp, °C 350 350
Preheat/max interpass temp, °C 170-180 150-180

The purpose of the project was to examine the tensile behaviour of two typical manual metal arc welds at moderately elevated temperatures. This was done to establish whether there were significant changes in tensile properties because of dynamic strain ageing; whether the weld metals of different types (Mn-Ni-Mo and C-Mn) showed the maximum response to strain ageing at the same temperature; and finally how behaviour was influenced by the strain rate during the tensile tests. Reports [1,2] indicate that the lower the strain rate, the lower the temperature showing the maximum effect.

Fig.1. Typical low strain rate load/extension curves for Mn-Ni-Mo weld metal, 1a) 20°C; 1b) 120°C; 1c) 160°C; 1d) 180°C; 1e) 200°C; 1f) 220°C.
Fig.1. Typical low strain rate load/extension curves for Mn-Ni-Mo weld metal, 1a) 20°C; 1b) 120°C; 1c) 160°C; 1d) 180°C; 1e) 200°C; 1f) 220°C.

Most work was concentrated on a low strain rate, as this was more relevant to likely strain rates in pressure vessels when they are operating at moderately elevated temperatures and require good upper shelf toughness, and consequently resistance to dynamic strain ageing, to avoid failure under certain fault conditions. The project was, in part, aimed at providing preliminary data for a programme* on the strain ageing behaviour of as-welded repair weld metal for pressure vessels.

*TWI Group Sponsored Project 5555, 'Strain ageing embrittlement of repair weld metals for service up to 350°C'.

Experimental

As-welded repair welds, which had been deposited in deep grooves in thick plate using relatively low heat inputs, provided appropriate test material. Details of the welds are summarised in Table 1 and the weld metal compositions in Table 2. As the welds had been deposited with well dried basic electrodes and had been held overnight at the preheat temperature of 150°C after welding, no further steps were taken to reduce the weld hydrogen level. The ductility subsequently measured in tests at ambient temperature showed no evidence of low values and fisheyes were not observed on the fracture surfaces.

Table 2 Chemical analyses of test welds

Sample Element, wt%
O S P Si Mn Ni Cr Mo V Cu Nb Ti Al B Sn Co O N
Mn-Ni-Mo weld 0.05 0.010 0.015 0.38 1.23 1.00 0.03 0.21 0.005 0.03 <0.002 0.004 0.003 <0.0003 <0.005 0.01 0.036 0.007
C-Mn weld 0.07 0.008 0.009 0.38 1.47 0.03 0.02 0.005 0.02 0.03 <0.002 0.010 <0.003 0.0004 <0.005 0.01 0.036 0.011

Analyses on final, low dilution weld runs.

Longitudinal tensile specimens of approximately 30mm gauge length and 6mm gauge diameter were machined from the test welds and tested at a strain rate of either 0.5 or 5 mm/min (equivalent to 2.6 x 10 -4 or 2.6 x 10 -3 strain/sec) over a range of temperatures from 20 to 260°C. Yield or 0.2% proof stresses and tensile strengths were determined from the load/extension traces of the testing machine; elongation and reduction of area (RA) were measured directly. All fracture surfaces were examined at low magnification for defects. The position of the fracture was also noted, as it is known that fracture near the end of the gauge length can lead to lower ductility values than normal.

Results

Test results are tabulated in Table 3, typical load extension curves for the Mn-Ni-Mo weld at low strain rates being shown in Fig.1. With the lower strain rate, testing at ambient temperature ( Fig.1a) gave normal yield stress behaviour, with the load rising again slowly to a maximum and then falling. At 100 and 120°C ( Fig.1b), behaviour (and properties, see Table 3) were similar, although the load/extension curve was rather irregular between first yield and maximum load, with a few load drops and recoveries.

Table 3 Results of tensile tests (specimen diameter 5.8mm, gauge length 31mm)

Strain rate Electrode Test temp,
°C
Yield or 0.2% PS,
N/mm 2
Tensile strength,
N/mm 2
Elongation,
%
RA,
%
Whether fracture in central part of gauge length Extent of jerky flow
Low Mn-Ni-Mo 20 540 615 19 67 Yes -
(0.5 mm/min)   100 515 595 18 62 Yes 2 yields
    120 510 615 20 67 Yes 4 yields
    140 510 650 18 60 Yes To fracture
    160 495 650 16 56 Yes To fracture
    180 480 630 15 46 Yes To maximum load
    200 540 665 15 56 Yes 12 yields to maximum load x
    220 510 665 17* 47* No None
    250 450 645 19* 47* No None
High Mn-Ni-Mo 20 530 605 21 70 Yes -
(5 mm/min)   140 505 585 18 68 Yes 5 yields
    160 500 625 18 60 Yes 5 yields
    180 495 640 19 63 Yes To near fracture
    200 485 630 17 60 Yes To beyond maximum load
    220 485 645 19 53 Yes To maximum load
    240 540 670 16 55 Yes 7 yields before maximum load x
    260 515 670 20 42 Yes None
Low C-Mn 20 520 590 22 69 Yes -
    120 490 630 14* 45* No To maximum load +
    140 470 600 11* 40* No To maximum load
    180 430 585 10* 37* No To maximum load
    200 455 630 10* 38* No Two yields

* Broke near end of gauge length.
x Starting beyond 0.2% PS.
+ With an intermediate smooth portion.

At 140 and 160°C ( Fig.1c), behaviour was quite different. After the first yield, the load dropped sharply and recovered many times until fracture ensued. In these tests, the tensile strength, but not the yield stress, was distinctly higher than at ambient, although RA values were somewhat lower. At 180°C ( Fig.1d), this so-called zig-zag, or irregular, yielding occurred only between yield and maximum load. At 200°C ( Fig.1e) multiple yielding only occurred up to maximum load from a strain roughly half way between maximum load and the 0.2% proof stress (no initial yielding being observed). The load drops were larger than at lower temperatures, the greatest being as much as 55 N/mm 2. At 220 ( Fig.1f) and 250°C, the weld metal did not yield, although tensile strength values were still higher and ductility values lower than at ambient.

With the higher straining rate, no new features were observed but the changes in behaviour occurred at a temperature about 40°C higher, i.e. irregular yielding up to 160 instead of 120°C and multiple yielding up to 240 instead of 200°C.

Few C-Mn weld metal specimens were available for tests, which were carried out at the low strain rate ( Table 3). Zig-zag yielding was found at 120°C, i.e. about 20°C lower than for the Mn-Ni-Mo weld metal, but this did not carry 0n beyond maximum load at any temperature and was only just evident at 200°C. Particularly low ductility values with this weld were in part caused by a tendency for fracture to occur near the end of the gauge length.

Because of scatter, trends of tensile properties with temperature ( Fig.2) should be interpreted cautiously. After initially weakening slowly with increasing temperature, the Mn-Ni-Mo specimens show increases in both tensile strength and yield or, more correctly, proof stress, the increase in proof stress being smaller and extending over a shorter temperature range. The higher strain rate gives an increase in both properties about 40°C higher - the same difference as was observed for the onset and cessation of multiple yielding.

Fig.2. Effect of temperature on tensile properties of aswelded weld metal: 2a) Mn-Ni-Mo, low strain rate; 2b) Mn-Ni-Mo, high strain rate; 2c) C-Mn low strain rate
Fig.2. Effect of temperature on tensile properties of aswelded weld metal: 2a) Mn-Ni-Mo, low strain rate; 2b) Mn-Ni-Mo, high strain rate; 2c) C-Mn low strain rate

Of the ductility parameters, a minimum in RA was not defined with any certainty up to 250 or 260°C with either series of Mn-Ni-Mo specimens. The curve of RA against temperature was, however, shifted to a higher temperature for the higher strain rate by a similar amount to the strength curves. The difference appeared to be less, however, with the elongation curves, both of which exhibited minima close to 200°C.

The C-Mn specimens, which were only tested at the lower strain rate and only up to 200°C, showed no rise in yield stress and a less marked one in tensile strength. Nevertheless, ductility values fell sharply to below 40% RA at 18o and 200°C and approximately 10% elongation at 140-200°C.

Discussion

The behaviour of the two types of weld tested is typical of steels undergoing dynamic strain ageing, showing multiple yielding, increases in strength and decreases in ductility. [1,2] Multipass welds are inhomogeneous in microstructure, mechanical properties and thermal history, particularly when taking into account the lower part of the thermal cycle relevant to strain ageing. This inhomogeneity may well account for the behaviour of the specimens which did not show multiple yielding until well past the 0.2% proof stress and the one in which multiple yielding stopped and re-started.

In Fig.3, the curves of properties against temperature have been brought together; these show that the higher strain rate with the Mn-Ni-Mo weld metal shifts the curves up by about 40°C. The changes in the different properties do not, however, occur at the same temperature for either strain rate. With the Mn-Ni-Mo material, the multiple yielding behaviour occurs roughly up to the maximum tensile strength and includes the minimum in elongation, but stops before the minimum RA (which was not reached with certainty in any series).

Fig.3. Comparison of tensile test results
Fig.3. Comparison of tensile test results

Theminimum in elongation occurs at a lower temperature than in RA and this difference may be because much of the elongation (especially with low ductility levels) occurs fairly uniformly over the whole gauge length, whereas the RA values are associated with the final stages of deformation over a short part of the gauge length. At the constant crosshead speed used for the present tests, this final deformation must necessarily take place at a higher local strain rate than the earlier uniform deformation and this could explain why the minimum RA occurs at a higher temperature than the minimum elongation.

If this is the case, it poses something of a dilemma when trying to use tensile test behaviour to assess likely tearing behaviour in pressure vessel service when strain rates are likely to be low. Tearing behaviour leading to fracture is probably closer to the processes occurring during RA than during uniform elongation, but, because deformation during necking in a tensile test at constant crosshead speed is taking place at an increased rate, the strain rates in practice are likely to be closer to those involved with uniform elongation.

In Fig.3, it can also be seen that the C-Mn weld metal reached its minimum elongation at a lower temperatuure than the Mn-Ni-Mo weld. It is important, therefore, to carry out tests at sufficient temperatures to establish that the minimum RA value has been reached if it is required to compare the strain ageing behaviour of different weld metals in order, for example, to select one with a good resistance to dynamic strain ageing.

Summary

Tests on Mn-Ni-Mo and C-Mn weld metals have shown that in the as-welded condition they exhibit classical dynamic strain ageing behaviour in tensile tests at moderately elevated temperatures. However, the minimum values of elongation and RA occur at different temperatures, and also appear to be affected by weld metal composition and strain rate. Thus, tests over a range of temperatures are necessary to make meaningful comparisons of the susceptibility of different weld metals to strain ageing embrittlement.


References

Author Title  
1 Baird J D: 'Strain ageing of steel - a critical review'. Iron and Steel 1963 36 186, 326, 368, 400, 450, also Metallurgical Progress 1963 (4) Iliffe Ltd London.  
2 Baird J D: 'The effects of strain-ageing due to interstitial solutes on the mechanical properties of metals'. Metallurgical Reviews No 149, Materials and Metals 1971 5 (2) 1-18.  
3 Feldstein J G et al: 'Repair welding of heavy-section steel components in LWRS'. Babcock and Wilcox Report NP-3614 to EPRI, Project 1236-1,July 1984. Return to text
4 Dawes M G and Burdekin F M: 'Brittle fracture tests on steel plate to BS 968: 1962'. BWJ 1967 14(5) 266-272. Return to text
5 Terashima H and Hart P H M: 'Effect of Al on C-Mn-Nb steel submerged-arc weld metal properties'. Weld J 1984 63 (6) 173s-183s. Return to text
6 Robinson J L: 'Through-thickness toughness variations in multipass arc welds'. Welding Institute conf 'Trends in steels and consumables for welding', Paper 40, Nov 1978. Return to text
7 Wheatley J M and Baker R G: 'Microstructural factors governing the yield strength of mild steel weld metal deposited by the metal-arc process'. BWJ 1963 10 23-28. Return to text