[Skip to content]

TWI
Search our Site
.

What is the best lead-free surface finish to use for printed circuit board assemblies?

TWI Frequently asked question

By Michèle Routley

There are a number of different surface finishes available; the best one to choose will depend on a product's specific application. Some suggestions are included in the table below.

MaterialThickness
(µm)
SolderabilityReflow SurvivabilityShelf LifeCostAdvantagesDisadvantages
Immersion Ag0.05-0.20Good5 reflows12 monthsMediumConsistent flat surface for SMT
Good electrical probe surface
Good solderability
Must be recycled quickly if mis-screened
Not available from all suppliers
Multiple board finishes difficult
SnAgCu
HASL
1-25Good5 reflows12 monthsMediumGood electrical probe surface
Withstands multiple process steps
Good solderability
Higher thermal stress process
No planar surface for SMT
Immersion
Sn
0.75-1.25Good5 reflows12 monthsMediumGood solderability
Consistent flat surface for SMT
Good electrical probe surface
Must be recycled quickly if mis-screened
Multiple board finishes difficult
Tin whiskers risk
Electroless Ni
Immersion Au
5 Ni
0.05-0.2 Au
V. Good4 reflows6 monthsHighExcellent solderability
Consistent flat surface for SMT
Minimal handling issues
Expensive
'Black Pad'
Multiple board finishes difficult
SnCu
HASL
1-25Good5 reflows12 monthsMediumGood solderability
Good shelf life
Withstands multiple process steps
Wider thickness variation than Sn-Pb HASL
Intermetallics formed before assembly
Electroless Pd0.15-0.40Good5 reflows12 monthsHighMinimal handling issues
Good solderability
Thick Pd causes brittle joints
Cost
Availability
Organic Solderable Preservative
(OSP)
0.15-0.50Good3+ reflows12 monthsLowGood planar surface
Low cost
No intermetallics before assembly
Strongest solder joints
Handling concerns; probing issues
Difficult obtaining adequate hole fill
Narrow process window for multiple passes

A consideration when changing to lead-free PCBs is that the board itself will need to withstand the higher processing temperatures for lead-free solder applications; this, like many of the changes required to comply with the RoHSDirective, may have cost implications. When considering laminate properties, some organisations are proposing to use other thermal parameters such as the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), time to delamination, and decompositiontemperature (T d ), as better predictive indicators than T g (glass transition temperature). Therefore, not only are increases in T g necessary, but also decreases in CTE and increases in the T d of the material.

For further assistance from TWI on RoHS and WEEE matters, contact Damien Kirkpatrick

What is the WEEE Directive?