C M Allen
TWI Ltd., Granta Park, Gt. Abington, Cambridge CB1 6AL, United
Kingdom.
Paper presented at Eurojoin 6, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 28
- 30 June, 2006.
Abstract
Hybrid laser-arc welding processes, in which a laser and an arc
are combined in the same process zone, can offer a number of
benefits over autogenous laser welding, including increased
productivity and a tolerance to fit upcomparable with arc welding.
This paper concentrates on the development of welding parameters
for an Nd:YAG laser-AC MIG arc hybrid process for thin aluminium
sheet, for potential application in the automotive industry. Melt
runs, buttwelding and lap welding trials have been carried out on
1.2mm thick 5251-H22 aluminium alloy, with characterisation by
metallographic section and radiography. A hybrid condition has been
developed which is stable to welding speeds inexcess of 8m/min,
representing a four fold increase in productivity compared to MIG
welding or a two fold increase in productivity compared to laser
welding. This hybrid condition has been applied with particular
success to edge lapwelds, where a gap tolerance of ten times that
of autogenous laser welding has been demonstrated. Internal weld
porosity is outside of BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001, but any application
would require a case-by-case assessment of fitness forpurpose,
and/or more thorough material preparation to reduce porosity.
Introduction
Hybrid laser-arc welding, originally proposed in the late 1970s,
[1,2] combines laser and
arc welding processes in a single process zone. It offers the
benefits of the separate processes, and overcomes some of their
respective drawbacks. Reported benefits compared to laser welding
[3,4,5] include:
- Increased tolerance to joint fit-up.
- Greater welding speed, leading to higher productivity.
- Increased penetration.
- Lower net heat input, leading to reduced distortion.
- Improved weld quality.
- The potential to replace some laser power, for a given depth of
penetration, by some less expensive arc power, thereby increasing
cost effectiveness.
Hybrid welding has received renewed interest in the past ten
years, principally concentrating on laser-MAG welding of C-Mn
steels, e.g. in shipbuilding panel lines. [6] An area of potential growth for the hybrid
process is in the automotive sector for thin sheet aluminium
joining. [7,8] Aside from
hybrid welding operations, the automotive industry is making
investments in laser technology, particularly in autogenous laser
welding and/or laser brazing of thin sheet steels for car body
construction, using robotmounted fibre optic delivered Nd:YAG laser
beams. These fabrication methods are flexible, high productivity,
and low distortion.
This paper addresses the further development of laser welding,
through Nd:YAG laser-AC MIG arc hybrid welding of thin sheet
aluminium alloy for future lightweight car body constructions.
AC MIG is a low heat input arc process, with demonstrated
penetration control and good gap bridging ability when welding thin
sheet aluminium. [9,10,11] In AC MIG, each current pulse passed
through the consumable electrode consists of both an electrode
positive (EP) part and an electrode negative (EN) part. The EN part
melts the electrode in preference to the base material,increasing
deposition rate and hence gap bridging ability, and also reducing
heat input in to the base material. In summary, this low heat
input, fine penetration control, high deposition rate technique is
well suited to welding ofthin sheet with demonstrated tolerance to
joint gaps.
The AC MIG process has been hybridised with low power density
Nd:YAG and diode lasers, [10,11] and welding speeds of up to 4m/min have
been reported, compared to 3m/min using the AC MIG arc without
laser, i.e. a productivity increase of 33%. In this work a Nd:YAG
laser of higher power density and capable therefore ofkeyhole
welding, is combined with AC MIG welding, with the aim of offering
welding speeds and productivity better than that of existing
autogenous keyhole laser welding processes, and with a gap bridging
ability better than laserwelding and more comparable to the AC MIG
process. Introduction of such a hybrid process in to an existing
Nd:YAG laser welding line would allow relaxation of fit up
tolerances, and increases in productivity, with minimal
additionalcapital expenditure being incurred.
Experimental Methods
Materials and preparation
5251-H22 (Al-2Mg) sheet aluminium alloy, 1.2mm in thickness, was
used. Prior to welding the sheet edges were dry machined, and top
and bottom faces of the sheets degreased with acetone. No further
steps were taken to remove anyhydrated aluminium oxides from the
region of the weld, which might otherwise improve weld quality
(e.g. reduce internal porosity). Such approaches would be unlikely
in an automotive fabrication environment. Two filler wires were
used,both 1.2mm in diameter: AWS ER5356 (Al-5Mg) wire and AWS
ER5556 (Al-5Mg-1Mn) wire.
Equipment
A Trumpf continuous wave HL4006D Nd:YAG laser was used,
operating at power levels at the workpiece of up to 3kW, whose beam
was focussed by a robot mounted optic to a 0.6mm diameter spot on
the sheet upper surface. A Daihen CPDACR200 arc power source was
used for AC MIG welding with an OTC-Daihen CMWH-147 wire feeding
unit. The laser was used with a travel angle (dragging) of 10°
off vertical, leading the AC MIG process by a separation of 2mm,
with the MIGtorch having a travel angle (pushing) of 15° off
vertical. These parameters were chosen on the basis of previous TWI
experience with hybrid welding of aluminium and reference to.
[10,11] Shielding of the
weld pool was provided by a flow of 20l/min of either He or Ar down
the MIG torch. A slot had to be cut into the MIG gas shroud to
avoiding clipping by the laser beam. In the case of full
penetration welds, theunderbead was shielded by a flow rate of
5l/min of Ar, supplied through an efflux channel measuring 10mm x
10mm, machined in to the welding jig.
Welding experiments
Given the number of process parameters and hence complexity of
the hybrid process, welding parameters were optimised in turn
for:
- Full penetration autogenous laser melt runs on sheet
- Full penetration autogenous laser butt welds
- Full penetration AC MIG melt runs on sheet
- Full penetration hybrid melt runs on sheet
- Partial penetration hybrid edge lap welds between two
overlapping sheets. In selected cases, the gap between the two
sheets was tapered from 0mm to 2mm, in order to assess the gap
bridging ability of the hybrid process
- Full penetration hybrid butt welds.
The ranges of principal variables used in each set of
experiments are summarised in Table 1.
Weld Examination
Radiography was performed to BS EN 1435:1997, to determine the
presence of welding imperfections, eg extent of porosity.
Transverse sections were prepared using standard metallographic
techniques, with subsequent metallographicexamination determining
weld shape and depth of penetration.
In the absence of a broadly accepted standard for fitness for
purpose of laser welds for automotive application, as a relative
indicator of weld quality, a standard for laser weld workmanship
was used, BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. Asthis is solely a standard for
workmanship, failure to meet a given class of weld in this standard
does not imply failure to be fit for a given application or
purpose. The latter should be assessed independently on a case by
casebasis.
Table 1. Ranges of principal experimental variables.
| Expt. type |
Laser power,
kW |
Travel speed,
m/min |
Top bead shielding |
Arc current,
amps |
Voltage trim setting* |
Penetration control setting** |
| Laser melt run |
3.0 |
3.0-8.6 |
20l/min Ar or 20l/min He |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| Laser butt weld |
| AC MIG melt runs |
n/a |
1.0-2.0 |
20l/min Ar or 20l/min He |
40-90 |
-2 to +3 |
- |
| Hybrid melt runs |
0.5-3.0 |
7.6-10.0 |
20l/min Ar |
80-130 |
0 to +5 |
-5 to +5 |
| Hybrid butt welds |
| Hybrid edge lap welds |
Notes:
- = not varied
* The Daihen AC MIG power source has an operation mode in which the
mean arc current can be freely adjusted and set by the operator
prior to welding. A feature of this operation mode, in common with
other commercially availablearc welding power sources, is that
other welding parameters such as the arc length or voltage, and
pulse characteristics of the current, are set synergically within
the power source. The current set by the operator and the
synergicprogram selected, determine the values of these other
parameters. In all work a synergic program setting of '42'
was used, corresponding to an AC pulsed MIG operation with a 1.2mm
diameter Al-Mg wire. Slight adjustments or 'trims' bythe
operator to the arc voltage away from this synergic setting are
possible, by selecting various positions on a potentiometer dial on
the power source. In this manner, deviations of up to +/-5V from
the synergic voltage can beselected. The details of the synergic
program and trim settings are included as an aid to the practical
user wishing to reproduce the results presented, although specific
to the power source used.
** the EN ratio of the current setting can be adjusted by the
operator away from the synergic setting, through different dial
settings of a potentiometer, between arbitrarily denominated values
of -5 to +5. The EN ratio has beendocumented to change the
penetration characteristics when AC MIG welding. [10] Once again, these settings, when used,
have been included as an aid to the practical user wishing to
reproduce the results.
Results and discussion
Autogenous laser melt runs
With He top bead shielding of 20l/min, at travel speeds of 3 and
4m/min, melt-through occurred in a few positions
('pinholes') along the weld length. At a travel speed of
5m/min, a consistent top and underbead was achieved. Attravel
speeds of 6 and 7m/min penetration was lost.
Switching to 20l/min Ar top bead shielding, all welds produced
visually exhibited a brighter top bead appearance, being more
effectively shielded against oxidation due to the greater density
of Ar compared to He. At a travel speedof 3m/min, pinholes
occurred. At travel speeds of 4 and 5m/min consistent top beads and
underbeads were achieved, with the reduced heat input at 5m/min
being preferred. This condition was selected as optimum and
repeated three times tocheck consistency. Fig.1 shows a
cross-section through one of these melt runs, whose profile was
acceptable to the highest class, class B (stringent), according to
BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. Radiography of these melt runs also
indicated an internalquality acceptable to class B (stringent) of
BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001. At higher travel speeds, of 6, 7 and
8m/min, penetration became intermittent.
Autogenous laser butt welds
|
Fig.1. Cross section through an autogenous laser melt
run produced at 5m/min with a laser power of 3kW and with Ar
shielding
|
The optimum laser melt run condition was transferred to a
nominal zero gap butt weld between sheets with machined edges. At
5m/min a narrower top bead was observed than when performing a melt
run, and some localised losses inpenetration were observed.
Reduction in travel speed by 10%, i.e. to 4.5m/min, increased
penetration and top bead width. This condition was again repeated
three times to check consistency. Fig.2 shows a
cross-section through one of these butt welds. The weld profile was
again acceptable to class B (stringent), as was the internal weld
quality as determined by radiography.
AC MIG melt runs
|
Fig.2. Cross section through an autogenous laser butt
weld produced at 4.5m/min with a laser power of 3kW and with Ar
shielding
|
For AC MIG melt runs, the slotted torch shroud to be used for
hybrid experiments was found unsuitable, therefore a conventional
shroud improving both melt pool shielding and arc stability, was
used. Similarly, arc stability was muchimproved using Ar as a
shielding gas, with an electrode stick out and shroud stand off of
10mm, compared to using He as a shielding gas, and an electrode
stick out and shroud stand off of 15mm. Varying both arc current
setting inincrements of 10A (without voltage trim being applied)
and travel speed in increments of 0.25m/min, the most stable
condition was found to be 50A at 1m/min. Penetration was less
consistent than for the laser melt runs. Faster travelspeeds
resulted in loss of arc stability, and higher currents resulted in
melt through.
In a second round of trials voltage trim was applied. The
condition that gave a stable arc at the highest welding speed
achieved was using an arc current set to 80A at 2m/min, with a
voltage trim of +2 or +3. This indicates that theapplication of a
positive trim stabilises the arc to both higher currents and
welding speeds. Top bead and underbead photographs from an AC MIG
arc melt run at 2m/min with an arc current set to 80A with a +3
trim arc are shown in Fig.3. Penetration was more
consistent than that achieved when using a 50A arc current,
untrimmed, at 1m/min, but still not fully consistent, as is shown.
In terms of weld profile, and particularly internal quality
(porosity),this melt run was not acceptable to BS EN ISO
13919-2:2001. Weldments can tolerate an appreciable amount of
porosity, that amount being material and alloy dependant, without
significantly affecting static mechanical properties such asyield
strength, and tensile strength and elongation being reduced as
cross-section area is reduced. [12,13] This philosophy, of an acceptance of a
certain porosity level, is commonly taken in the automotive
industry, where expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to apply
pre-welding aluminium cleaning treatments to reduce weldporosity
levels are not the norm. That said, reduced porosity levels in both
AC MIG and hybrid laser-AC MIG welds can be achieved with more
attention to material cleaning.
[10,11]
|
Fig.3. Top bead and underbead of selected AC MIG along
melt run condition at 2m/min travel speed, using a mean arc current
set to 80A, with voltage trim set to +3
|
|
a) Top bead
|
b) Underbead
|
| |
Hybrid melt runs
1. Basic conditions: Combining the arc and
laser, with the AC MIG melt run conditions (initially, those
developed without voltage trim) but at the optimum laser melt run
travel speed, successfully resulted in a stablearc at much higher
speeds than without the laser. However, the increase in heat input
led to melt through. A variety of higher travel speeds and arc
current settings (all without voltage trim) were tried to find a
stable conditionwhich led to consistent penetration without melt
through, resulting in an optimum condition at 7.6m/min with a mean
arc current set to 80~90A. This represented a ~50% increase in
welding speed compared with autogenous laser welding,and just over
three and a half times faster than the fastest condition
established when using the AC MIG arc on its own.
2. Effect of penetration control trim: Aside
from reducing travel speed down from 8m/min to 7.6m/min to achieve
more consistent penetration, the penetration trim control was also
adjusted on the arc power set.Penetration trim control settings
were chosen between a minimum of arbitrary denomination
'-5' to a setting of '+3' (maximum possible setting
was '+5'). These adjustments change the EN ratio of the AC
current, although the magnitude ofthese changes in EN ratio were
not recorded. Penetration control trims were applied to a reference
melt run condition of mean arc current of 80A (with zero voltage
trim) at a travel speed of 8m/min. Unlike the reported effect
ofpenetration control trim on AC MIG welds, [11] no such effect was seen in the hybrid
melt runs. This was probably due to the dominance of the laser over
the arc, in terms of achieving penetration, at the high speeds used
in these experiments.
3. Effect of reducing laser power: Melt runs
were performed at lower travel speeds with reduced laser powers, to
determine the minimum laser power required to stabilise the arc,
and up to what speed that arc would bestabilised. All experiments
were performed with a mean arc current set to 80A with zero voltage
trim. These experiments are summarised in Fig.4. As
Fig.4 shows, 1kW of laser power stabilised the arc at
1.5m/min, representing a 50% increase on the welding speed of
1m/min achieved without the laser (shown as the 'arc alone'
point in Fig.4). However, a trimmed 80A arc, as reported
above, was stable to 2m/min. At these modest welding speeds,
voltage trim appears to be a far more 'economic' means of
stabilising the arc than adding a low power (1kW) focussedlaser
source.
4. Effect of voltage trim:
|
Fig.4. Hybrid laser-arc melt run conditions, as a
function of whether a stable arc was achieved, with laser powers
<3kW, and with the two best hybrid conditions achieved with 3kW,
and the best condition using theAC-MIG arc on its own also
included. Dashed line indicates inferred delineation between region
of stable and unstable arc conditions. All results without voltage
trim
|
As with AC MIG melt runs, the application of voltage trim
stabilises the arc to higher currents and welding speeds. With a
welding speed of 8.2m/min, the arc was stabilised to a mean
currentsetting of 110A with a voltage trim of +3. This represents a
welding speed increase of up to 80% compared with laser welding,
and a ~40% current increase compared to an untrimmed hybrid
setting. Top bead and underbead photographs fromthis hybrid melt
run are shown in
Fig.5. This profile of this particular
melt run was to class C (intermediate) in accordance with BS EN ISO
13919-2:2001. However, as with the AC MIG melt runs, internal
porosity was not accepted to BS EN ISO 13919-2:2001, anda separate
fitness for purpose assessment would be required.
|
Fig.5. Top bead and underbead of selected hybrid melt
run condition at 8.2m/min, with mean arc current set to 110A, and
with a voltage trim of +3:
|
|
a) Top bead
|
b) Underbead
|
| |
Hybrid edge lap welds
1. Basic conditions: For edge lap welding, as a
start point the same conditions (without voltage trim) and travel
angles were used as for hybrid melt runs. Initially, a work angle
of 20° off vertical was used butthis led to penetration of the
underlying sheet. The work angle was therefore increased to 40°
off vertical, the maximum possible given the diameter of MIG shroud
used, with the laser focussed on to the top surface of the
lowersheet and the MIG wire aimed in to the corner of the joint.
This also resulted in penetration of the underlying sheet. To avoid
penetration a series of further experiments indicated that it was
necessary to increase travel speed to8.6m/min, reduce laser power
to 2.8kW, and, to counteract the resulting loss in arc stability,
increase the mean arc current set to 110A. Top bead and underbead
photographs from a hybrid edge lap weld with these conditions are
shown inFig.6. Fig.7 shows a cross-section
through this lap weld.
|
Fig.6. Top bead and underbead of hybrid lap weld welded
at 8.6m/min, with a mean arc current set to 110A, without voltage
trim, and using a laser power of 2.8kW
|
|
a) Top bead
|
b) Underbead
|
| |
2. Effect of voltage trim:
|
Fig.7. Cross section through a hybrid lap weld at a
travel speed of 8.6m/min, with a mean arc current set to 110A,
without voltage trim, and using a laser power of 2.8kW
|
Using the above conditions, applying a positive voltage trim of
setting +3 further stabilised the arc, for example to current
settings of up to 130A at a travel speed of 8.2m/min. It wasfound
necessary to position the wire 2mm out of the joint line of the
edge lap joint line on the underlying sheet to maintain a regular
top bead appearance. This was probably due to preferential arcing
along the shortest path, i.e onto the top corner of the upper
sheet, which occurred when the wire was positioned pointing
directly at the joint line. With these increased arc current
conditions penetration of the lower sheet occurred once again. In
an attempt toreduce penetration, the travel speed was increased to
8.6m/min, however, this destabilised the arc. More successful was
to reduce the laser power to 2.9kW. The fact that small (<10%)
changes in process parameters led to largedifferences in process
stability and weld profile do indicate that the operating window of
this process is relatively small. This condition was repeated three
times to check consistency. Top bead and underbead photographs from
one ofthese hybrid lap welds are shown in
Fig.8.
Fig.9 shows a cross-section through this lap weld. As with
the hybrid melt runs reported above, the radiographs of these welds
contained a number of fine pores, with a mean maximum diameter of
~0.3mm. As noted before, thepresence of this porosity would
necessitate a fitness for purpose assessment, rather than simple
adherence to a standard of workmanship. It is anticipated that
reduced levels of porosity could be achieved by more stringent
parentmaterial preparation prior to welding, but this was not
considered to be representative of the preparation that would be
carried out routinely in the automotive industry, to whom this work
had been targeted.
|
Fig.8. Top bead and underbead of a hybrid lap weld at a
travel speed of 8.2m/min, with a mean arc current set to 130A, with
a voltage trim of +3, and using a laser power of 2.9kW
|
|
a) Top bead
|
b) Underbead
|
| |
3. Gap bridging:
|
Fig.9. Cross sections through a hybrid lap weld at a
travel speed of 8.2m/min, with a mean arc current set to 130A, with
a voltage trim of +3, and using a laser power of 2.9kW
|
Edge lap welds were made using the hybrid condition developed, with
tapered gaps between the sheets both starting at zero and running
to a nominal gap of 2mm, and from a nominal gap of 2mm running
tozero gap. These welds were then compared with equivalent
autogenous laser welds made at the same travel speed.
Table
2 summarises the gap bridging results, with the actual gap
sizes being determined by feeler gauge and/or cross-sectioning.
Table 2. Gap bridging results for edge lap welds made by the
hybrid laser-AC MIG process and the autogenous laser process.
Note:
*Gap bridging for the purposes of this work was defined as physical
connection of the two sheets after welding, with the resulting weld
bead of a profile not necessarily acceptable to ISO 13919-2.
| Weld type |
Nominal gap |
Gap bridging* until |
| Hybrid laser-AC MIG |
0-2mm |
~0.9mm |
| Hybrid laser-AC MIG |
2-0mm |
~1.1mm |
| Autogenous laser |
0-2mm |
~0.1mm |
| Autogenous laser |
2-0mm |
Determined by feeler gauge to be <0.1mm |
As Table 2 shows, in the case of the hybrid welds, with
a gap increasing from zero, bridging was maintained to a gap size
of ~1mm, and with a gap tapering down to zero, gap bridging was
first achieved at a gap size also of ~1mm.With larger gap sizes
holes appeared in the top bead. In the autogenous laser welding
process gap bridging was lost at a value ten times as small at
~0.1mm. The hybrid process is therefore far better in terms of gap
bridging in thecase of this joint geometry. This large difference
arose from the supply of extra weld metal material from the MIG
wire consumable. Laser with cold wire feed would be more tolerant
than the autogenous process, but welding speeds wouldhave to be
reduced to allow the laser to not only melt the parent material but
the wire as well. The hybrid process has the advantage that arc
energy, not laser, is effectively used to melt the wire.
Hybrid butt welds
1. Basic conditions: For butt welding, as a
start point the same conditions (without voltage trim) were again
used as for hybrid melt runs. With these conditions penetration was
heavier, and localised melt-throughoccurred in one position.
Increasing welding speed to 8.4m/min still led to localised melt
through, and higher speeds led to loss of penetration.
2. Effect of voltage trim, heat input, process
separation and laser defocus position: Following on from
earlier work, a +3 voltage trim was selected. However, this again
resulted in localised melt-through. Reducingheat input by
increasing speed and/or reducing laser power reduced, but could not
entirely eliminate, the occurrence of these localised
melt-throughs. Different laser-arc separations of 0mm and 4mm were
tried, but without success, andin the case of a 4mm separation arc
stability was lost. Different laser defocus positions of +2mm and
+4mm were also tried, but led to loss of penetration. The origin of
these localised melt throughs, or pinholes, may result from
shorttime scale (<20ms) variations in any one of the
following:
- Arc power: short term variations in the arc were indeed
measured using high frequency monitoring equipment.
- Wire feed rate: consistent high speed feeding of soft aluminium
wires during arc welding is a documented problem.
- Laser power arriving at and absorbed by the work: as opposed to
variations in output power, these would more likely be fluctuations
in power arriving at or absorbed by the work (e.g. due to
fluctuations in the laser plume or keyhole).
- A 'random event' occurring in the weld pool (eg sudden
localised build up of porosity).
Whatever the cause, these hole features were not seen at the low
speeds used when using the arc on its own, where short time
instabilities may be better accommodated due to the longer freezing
time/slower solidification velocity.Nor were they seen in hybrid
melt runs or non fully penetrating butt welds, where the weld pool
may be slightly better supported, due to the absence of any
abutting edges, or underlying non-melted material respectively.
Conclusions
The hybrid Nd:YAG laser-AC MIG welding process benefits, (and
limitations), for joining 1.2mm thick sheets of 5251-H22 aluminium
alloy have been quantified for both butt welding and edge lap
welding. The main conclusions of thiswork are:
- The Nd:YAG laser and AC MIG welding processes can be
successfully combined in a hybrid process suitable for high speed
welding of thin sheet aluminium for automotive body
construction.
- Hybrid welding at speeds of over 8m/min at 3kW laser power have
been achieved, over four times faster than the AC MIG arc on its
own, and up to 80% faster than autogenous laser welding.
- The application of a positive voltage trim stabilises the AC
MIG arc to currents greater than 50% higher than without trim.
- When hybrid edge lap welding, gaps of up to 1mm between 1.2mm
thickness sheets can be bridged, ten times those tolerated by
equivalent autogenous laser welding process.
- An assessment of fitness for purpose of the welds made using
this process would need to be made on a case by case basis.
Attention to material cleanliness may be required to reduce the
observed porosity levels, if indeed these prove unacceptable for a
given application.
- This hybrid welding process appears sensitive to drop through
in full penetration welds, e.g. butt welds, and is therefore better
suited to partial penetration weld geometries, such as edge lap
welds.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Industrial Members of TWI as part of
the TWI Core Research Program.
References
- Steen W M and Eboo M: 'Arc
Augmented Laser Welding'. Paper presented at the 4th
International Conference on Advances in welding processes,
Harrogate (UK), 9-11 May 1978. Part 1, paper 17, pp.257-265.
- Steen W M and Eboo M: 'Arc Augmented Laser Welding'.
Metal construction Vol.11, No.7, July 1979, pp.332-335.
- Downs D L and Mulligan S J:
'Hybrid CO 2 laser-MAG welding of carbon steel - a
literature review and initial study' TWI Members Report 739,
March 2002.
- Shi S G and Hilton P A: 'A comparison of the gap-bridging
capability of CO 2 laser and hybrid CO 2
laser MAG welding on 8mm thickness C-Mn steel plate'. TWI
Members Report 792, February 2004.
- Allen C M: 'Laser welding of aluminium alloys - principles
and applications'. TWI Members Report 795, March 2004.
- Roland F, Reinert T and Pethan G:
'Laser welding in shipbuilding - an overview of the activities
at Meyer Werft'. Paper presented at the IIW International
Conference on Advanced processes and technologies in welding and
allied processes, Copenhagen (Denmark), 24-25 June 2002,
pp.B-II.
- Anon: AutoTechnology 6/2002,
pp.36-39.
- Graf T and Staufer F: 'Laser-hybrid welding drives VW
improvements'. Welding Journal, January 2003, pp.43-48.
- Mulligan S J: 'Pulsed MIG arc
welding processes for joining of thin sheet aluminium'. TWI
Members Report 771, July 2003.
- Ueyama T, Tong H, Yazawa M,
Hirami M, Nakata K, Kihara T and Ushio M: 'High speed welding
of aluminium alloy sheets with laser assisted AC pulsed MIG
process'. IIW Asian Pacific International Congress,
Proceedings, Conference, Singapore, October 2002, Vol.3-4, Paper
33, pp.11.
- Tomita N, Ueyama T, Hasegawa S,
Yasufuku T and Ueda Y: 'Development of laser-arc hybrid welding
robot system'. IIW-1791-2004.
- Harris I D: 'A review of
literature on porosity formation and recommendations on the
avoidance of porosity in MIG welding'. TWI Members Report 386,
December 1988.
- Lawrence F V, Jr and Munse W H: 'Effects of porosity on the
tensile properties of 5083 and 6061 aluminium alloy weldments',
Welding Research Council Bulletin, No. 181.